Moirai gives clinical governance leads one operating file for AI tools: intended use, owner, regulatory status, evidence gaps, incident pathway, review cadence, and board-ready reporting.
Failure mode
The dangerous version is a practice knowing which AI tools are in use but not being able to prove who owns them, when they were reviewed, which evidence is missing, and what happens after an incident.
Score, evidence gaps, RANZCR mapping, tool-level risk, and a 30/90 day action plan.
Owner, use case, regulatory status, current risk, incidents, evidence state, and next review.
Hash-based proof link for report and decision-pack integrity without opening the private workspace.
Clinical leaders do not need another abstract governance framework. They need an evidence file that survives committee review, board reporting, insurer scrutiny, and staff turnover.
Every governed AI tool needs an accountable owner, use case, regulatory position, evidence status, and next review date.
Missing vendor documents, expired policies, absent validation notes, and unresolved incidents become visible actions rather than meeting notes.
The Governance Snapshot and Gap Analysis are output artifacts from the maintained register and evidence vault, not separate hand-built documents.
Name the AI tools in use or under evaluation across the practice.
Confirm the governance owner and next review date for each tool.
Identify evidence gaps that would matter to a board, insurer, regulator, or medico-legal reviewer.
Use the sample pack to see the report and register before a paid assessment.